Saturday, 11 July 2009

Sent - Date: Friday, June 5, 2009 11:27 AM - Subject: Re: Patient and Public Engagement


Dear Mr Gregor

As Mr Bob Fiddaman has seen fit to escalate his targeting of me, and done exactly what I predicted and informed you he would do in my email of May 22nd 09–

Again, I stress, I am not asking you to comment - but I do need to question your discernment in discussing matters with Mr Fiddaman and by doing so giving him license to put others (including myself) in a compromised situation that he can - and will use for further self promotion and / or castigation - depending whether those put forward choose to work with you - or not.”

by posting the following

“See minutes of meeting Bob Fiddaman had with MHRA.

Ask yourself why Mardi Bennett refuses to acknowledge that the meeting was about ALL SSRi’s.

Bennett has been offered the chance to meet with the MHRA, in fact, it was Bob Fiddaman who recommended they speak with her. It is not known if she has the balls to face them face to face. I’m sure if she ever does she will repeatedly harp on about the ’single issue of Seroxat’.

Mardi Bennett continues to rant and rave about Seroxat campaigners, despite evidence that her fixation, Bob Fiddaman, has tried to make changes with ALL SSRi’s.

Is it because the minutes to the MHRA meeting do not fit in with her blinkered views that she still continues in her quest to fit peices of a jigsaw together that aren’t actually there?”

on a blog he has started specifically for the purpose on June 2nd 09

after I wrote an explanatory post , June 2nd 09, uksurvivors group due to concerns about another person - “Steve” – who had become involved and had been directed by Mr Fiddaman to read there -

“Steve” - obviously uneducated in the arena he had been baited into by Mr Bob Fiddaman, of his deleterious reputation and calculated, devious manipulation was probably expecting --after complying with a request for more information to “put the records straight” -- the posts about the family to be removed - NOT just edited!

Stressing again that I am not asking you to comment, but being aware that you are following the Blogs and therefore Mr Bob Fiddamans activities -,I refer you to the following two Blogs

which he has claimed ownership of by way of stating he was editing one: -

http://farm4/. com/3601/ 3586075255_ 55b2b82a04_ o.jpg

where he has targeted others family members and myself.

In direct response to a question from another member of the Yahoo groups I posted the following on June 3rd 09

when I didn’t receive a response by the following day, June 4th, I copied it to two other boards I knew the questioner posted on, including the one “Steve” had been directed too.

Mr Fiddamans vitriolic attack --including his starting his Tuesday1st blog-- I feel leaves me no option but to publish our correspondence to clarify my position, either on my blog or on a more permanent fixture; Where if taken forward will be a public record befitting discussions related to the MHRA Public and Patient Engagement Strategy (PPES).

I appreciate the privacy aspect of this decision, but trust this will not be met with any objections as all correspondence about the MHRA PPES, can be requested under the Freedom of Information Act, used and quoted -- usually out of context -- by others.

I would also appreciate your letting me know if there is anything you would like redacted from our correspondence before it is published, which I plan to do at the weekend.

Kind Regards


From: Gregor, Simon

To: Redacted

Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2009 12:28 PM

Subject: RE: Patient and Public Engagement

1 comment:

  1. Hi fellas,
    Thank you so much for this wonderful article really!
    If someone want to read more about that MHRA approval I think this is the right place for you!